Company: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Industry: Transportation / Rideshare
Key Cases: DOJ Settlement (2022), NFB v. Uber, Multiple State Actions
Primary Issues: Wheelchair accessible vehicles, app accessibility, service animal policies
Uber Accessibility Case Study
Uber Technologies has faced significant legal challenges regarding accessibility for riders with disabilities. From Department of Justice enforcement actions to lawsuits by disability rights organizations, Uber's cases have shaped accessibility requirements for the rideshare industry. This case study examines the key issues, settlements, and lessons learned.
→
Case Overview
Key Facts
→
Settlement Amount
DOJ Action 2022
$2.2 Million in monetary damages to more than 1,000 individuals with disabilities who were charged wait time fees while loading wheelchairs or mobility devices.
Additional requirements for policy changes, driver training, and ongoing compliance monitoring.
Key Issues
Wait Time Fee Discrimination
The Department of Justice investigation found that Uber's "wait time" fee policy discriminated against passengers with disabilities:
- Uber charged passengers a per-minute fee after a two-minute wait period
- Passengers using wheelchairs or other mobility devices often needed more time to enter vehicles
- Blind passengers required additional time to locate vehicles
- The policy effectively charged disabled passengers more for the same service
Wheelchair Accessible Vehicle (WAV) Availability
- Limited availability of wheelchair-accessible vehicles in most markets
- Long wait times for WAV requests compared to standard vehicles
- Inconsistent WAV service coverage across cities and regions
- Riders unable to travel spontaneously as able-bodied riders can
App Accessibility Issues
- Screen reader compatibility problems with the Uber app
- Difficulty navigating the app using VoiceOver and TalkBack
- Inaccessible map features for selecting pickup and dropoff locations
- Missing accessibility labels on interactive elements
Service Animal Denials
- Drivers refusing rides to passengers with service animals
- Inadequate driver training on service animal requirements
- Failure to enforce policies against discriminatory drivers
Outcomes and Settlements
| Settlement Component | Requirements |
|---|---|
| Monetary Relief | $2.2 million to affected passengers, with individual payments up to $5,000 |
| Wait Time Policy | Waive wait time fees for passengers who certify they need additional time due to disability |
| App Modifications | Add accessible options in the app for passengers to request fee waivers |
| Driver Training | Enhanced training on disability awareness and ADA requirements |
| Compliance Monitoring | Regular reporting to DOJ on accessibility improvements and complaint resolution |
| WAV Commitments | Expansion of wheelchair-accessible vehicle programs in major markets |
Lessons Learned
→
For Transportation Companies
Compliance Requirements
- Fee structures must not disproportionately burden passengers with disabilities
- Wheelchair-accessible vehicles must be reasonably available
- Apps must be accessible to users with visual, motor, and cognitive disabilities
- Service animal policies must be clearly communicated and enforced
- Driver training must include disability awareness and legal requirements
→
For All Service Providers
Key Takeaways
- Consider how policies may have disparate impact on people with disabilities
- Mobile apps are subject to ADA accessibility requirements
- DOJ actively investigates and enforces digital accessibility
- Proactive accessibility planning is less costly than remediation after enforcement
- Engage with disability communities when developing new services